Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Lab 6 - Testing



In CEP 817 we test a prototype made about a problem of practice we work on throughout the semester. My problem of practice was using math manipulatives in a constructive way in the classroom. For this, I created math kits for the kindergarten students to use to test. I pulled a small group of students from my class, all with varying ability levels to test the kits. I allowed the students to examine the materials before moving on to the testing phase, just so they could get a feel. For my students to be able to understand that they were to critique what I was doing, I demonstrated an example of something that I saw to change. This allowed students to see that it was alright to find things wrong with the product. I then allowed the students to go through various activities and interact with the materials while writing down their feedback of the process.

To view the video click 

Final Reflection Paper

Please view my final reflection piece here

Monday, May 2, 2016

My View of Teaching


 
The idea I chose to work with was my view of teaching. For that, I created a teacher starter kit, it includes a pen, idea books, inspirational books, and test scores.  When I started back in undergrad, teaching was not all about test scores and how children are doing on a test. Now, it is a conversation had almost daily about where students are testing, are they on grade level, what should they be working on, and how do we get their scores up. It is an exhausting conversation to constantly be having, but it is all about the data now. Teaching is also about being creative, coming up with new ideas, keeping a child's interest in this day of so much technology. Instead of reinventing the wheel, I am constantly looking for new lesson ideas online, in books, and from co-teachers just to keep the process of learning going. The purple pen is a part of everything in my classroom in writing. Years ago, I read that instead of writing and correcting in red, like I grew up with, that purple is a calming color for students and does not cause as much anxiety. Since that point, I have checked and corrected everything in purple. The last two items in my kit  are the inspirational books. Teaching is being a teacher, a mom, a dad, a therapist, a nurse, a counselor, and about 5 other jobs all rolled into one. At times, we as teachers need to be reminded about the how and why we do it. We also need help and advice on new challenges throughout the year. Though everyone's inspiration is different, Ron Clark and Dr. Seuss are mine. Throughout the year, I pull out these stories just to remind myself what I am really doing with my students and my end goals. I also use them as reminders to I may need to change things about myself in order for them to understand. 

Prototype is a hard concept for me to wrap my head around. I always want it to be all the way perfect and have no hiccups in the process. That being said, it is hard for me to even start the process because I want things to go exactly as planned. The construction process did change for me. At first, I thought about making a picture collage on a board, but then realized, I had all the items to create this idea. Once I started thinking of that, the process was very simple for me to complete.

Sunday, May 1, 2016

Problem of Practice Final



For my problem of practice, I chose to work on how I use my math manipulatives in the classroom. Whenever I would pull out the manipulatives before, my students would play and build with them, instead of completing the math assignment. It was becoming a very large frustration in my teaching. For my project, I decided to design some math kits for my students. Not only did the kits contain the manipulatives, but they also contained index 
cards for the students to use while I am up teaching the lesson. I realized that the students needed a physical place to put their items while they were following along in the math lesson. 

Empathize 

During this portion, I worked with my co-teacher in observing her classroom. I was able to sit through a lesson as a student, without having my students up talking and getting my help. In this situation I was able to see what it felt like being a 5-year-old, waiting for others in the classroom to get it together to move on with the lesson. If it was taking too long, or I understood what to do, I would finish my work quickly, while those other children were still trying to get it together. I began to see just how easily distracted I could get, while also understanding how easily distracted a child could get. 

Define

Define mode really let me ask the questions that I may not have noticed were needing to be asked. It was hard to see that every question had an answer that could be linked to another question. In asking myself these questions I began to see links of what needed to be worked on with the students. The following are the questions I asked myself while starting this project. 

Why I think my students play with manipulatives instead of following instructions is because use to playing with toys all the time.  Why do I think they are used to playing with toys all the time is because they are 5 years old and come from homes where parents don't necessarily interact with them in educational ways. Why do I think parents don't interact with their child in educational ways is because the students test below grade level and don't show a constant understanding of basic skills. Why do students test below grade level and don't show a constant understanding of basic skills is because parents are not working with their child at home. Why are parents not working with their child at home is because they are working families, who may have more than one job, and may not be home when their child is doing homework, allowing the child to play all the time.

Ideate

The ideate phase was my favorite part of the problem of practice. I tend to get overwhelmed with things at times and have to walk away from things. I never realized just how much the incubation period helped with the design process of this phase. Jotting down what I was thinking of and walking away from it, helped me to realize that I had more questions to ask before moving on. I was no longer stuck on just basic questions, but was getting into more in depth thinking of my process. Since beginning of this design, and learning about this process, I began to do it more consciously in my writing and the other processes. It allowed for me to come up with more ideas and things to change to help the process.

I also enjoyed being able to brainstorm with my co teacher. While we do this a lot throughout our week, I like being able to get a second opinion and help on subject matters. Being able to sit there and just list ideas of things to do was also interesting. She has come up with some fun and different activities for the students to do while participating in a class activity. 

 Prototype

Creating a prototype was a hard process for me. I was stuck on a specific idea of building a prototype and felt that it needed to be perfect the first time around. But it never had to be, because a prototype is just a test type. I had to get over that to be able to understand that it was not going to look perfect or be ready to go the first time out. It was a difficult concept for me to wrap my head around at first. Once I began to put together the prototype things went more smoothly. I started with just using clear bags, and making copies of index cards for the kits. I chose topics that we cover in kindergarten that tend to use a lot of manipulative work. Once I had an idea of what one kit was able to look like, I created a few more to use with my test group. 



Test

For a moment during the testing phase, I thought about testing my whole class and getting opinions. I then realized I wouldn’t get results like I wanted because some students would see it as a game, while others would be racing through it. I chose 5 students in my class all from varying math levels of low to high. I went through the process of letting them look at the kits, interact with the kits, and then give feedback. While at first the students saw everything as perfect, once I pointed out a flaw that I saw, they went on to being more comfortable explaining things. They even gave me ideas of ways to make it easier for the students who are struggling readers. It was a very informative run, and allowed me to begin creating new kits for the students next year to use at the beginning of the year. 

 

Through this whole process I learned that designing is not a one step or one minded idea. I am so used to hearing about how a designer came up with this or that, but for it truly to be a design, it needs to be a team collaboration at points. You also need to think about who you are truly designing for. In teaching, we design things for students, who are all at varying age levels, abilities, and understanding of a process. We need to be able to learn how to take all of that information and come up with something that is meant to benefit them.  The whole process interested me to the point that I was sharing what I was learning with my co-workers in staff meetings because I saw it beneficial for us to use as a school with some of the problems that we are having. 


I learned that as a designer myself, I need to get over the fact that I want everything to be perfect and work perfectly the first time out. In order to really go through the process, I need to be able to test, and fix things based on what I am creating. It was hard for me to grasp that concept at first. I also learned not only about the incubation period, but also how beneficial it is to the thought process. You really can come up with new ideas just by jotting things down, clearing your head, and going back to them later. It allowed for me as a designer to come up with even more ideas and thoughts in the process.

Monday, April 18, 2016

Testing the Kits

When creating my protocol, I thought about using my whole class as a test group, however I felt that some students would not understand what I was asking for, or would return any feedback that would stay on topic so I decided  to pull a specific group of students. My users were 3 girls, and 2 boys either 5 or 6 years old, who range in ability and understanding of math skills. I pulled students who I knew would benefit from using the manipulatives in their math skills and would also take it seriously while participating. 
  
For this prototype I was testing math kits that I created for my classroom. In the kits were frogs, base ten blocks, unit blocks, chains, and a variety of index cards. Each index card had a different math idea on it, which included graphing, subtraction, addition, sorting, a ten frame, and a number line. These are all math concepts that kindergartner's learn throughout the year. 

The protocol for my test was to place all the supplies on the table for the the students. I then explained to the students that they were helping me with a grad school project and that I needed them to practice using the kits and help me find ways to make it better. I explained to them that a prototype is an example of a project that we have not finished and might need some changes. I then compared it to how we practice our handwriting, and that we may need to go back to edit things so that our work gets better. We then began megoing over the supplies that we had on the desk. I asked the students to take out one frog and use the number line card. Following the number line we went over addition, subtraction, ten frame, sorting, and graphing. Each index card the students first participated in the activity and then were asked feedback on things that they liked and things that they didn't like and would like to change. 

It was hard for me to think of a way to run this test, while also getting feedback. The kindergartners have a hard time understanding the concept of being able to critique the teacher and that they are allowed to find things that were wrong with the prototype. I also know that I would not be able to ask the students to give a written response on the prototype, so it would be more at the time answers.

When I started the testing, the student's looking over the supplies said that kits were fun and they liked them. I asked if anything needed to be changed, and they said no, they were perfect. We then moved onto using the number line. They had fun playing the frog jumping activity and asked why we hadn't played it when we were learning addition and subtraction. I asked if there was anything that I needed to change, and at first they said no. I then realized I should have labeled each card and brought that up. The students all agreed and then brought up that they would like a reminder of addition to jump forward, and for subtraction to jump backwards. We then moved onto our addition card. The first thing they said was to label the card. They also wanted to make the boxes bigger because they could only fit 5 items in each box and they wanted to add more than that. They also wanted to add a box to push all the pieces to so that they could remember to count them altogether. We moved on to our subtraction card. On this card, the students said it was confusing, so they wanted something labeled with the big number, and then a place to slide what you were taking away.  One child brought up using a dry erase marker, and wanted the cards laminated so that they could write the numbers on them to remind themselves. We then moved on to the ten frame card. The students brought up making the ten frame something fun, like a lily pad, or house. They wanted something that would remind them to do math, but that they could have fun with at the same time. They also wanted a spot to write the number on the top, so that they could remember what they were working on.  On the sorting card, they brought up labeling the top with different ways they could sort, so that they could mark it for others to know.  At the end of the test, the students brought up that the cards could all be different colors, just in case they forgot what the card looked like and to help them if they couldn't read the card label. Overall the students liked the cards because they liked having a place to put things, instead of just having to sort them on the table like we have been doing. 

Through doing this testing I learned that there are a lot of things that I sometimes don't think about that my students do like the help with. For example, labeling a card so that the students can show how they sorted, I would have never thought of that. It was a process that I enjoyed with my students and being able to get feedback not only for the testing of the kits, but also to use in the classroom as a teacher during instruction.  It also helped to see just how I am able through minor fixes am able to make these math concepts and manipulatives more accessible for my students to use, and less of an issue for me in the classroom.
Addition
Number Line

Subtraction

Ten Frame